The
environmental crisis increasingly threatening the sustainability of human life
cannot be separated from the cultural crisis that has transformed how humans
view and treat nature. This idea emerged during the 2nd Hybrid National Seminar
Series titled "From a Culture of Adaptation and Conservation to a Culture
of Exploitation and Commercialization," organized through a collaboration
between the Cultural Commission of the Indonesian Academy of Sciences (AIPI),
the Agency for Pancasila Ideology Development (BPIP), and UIN Sunan Kalijaga
Yogyakarta, on Thursday (11/6/2026) at the Medical Faculty Theater, 4th Floor.
The
seminar featured four speakers from various disciplines who explored the
connections between culture, environment, public policy, indigenous communities,
and religious values in confronting the global ecological crisis.
AIPI
Cultural Commission member Prof. Yunita Triwardani Winarto opened the
discussion with a presentation titled "Cultural Crisis in the Anthropocene
Era: Can We Survive Amid Landscape Change, Modernization, and Climate
Change." She argued that culture fundamentally grows out of a harmonious
relationship between humans and nature within their collective living spaces.
However, various policies and practices of natural resource control rooted in
colonial legacies have shifted this relationship into an exploitative one.
She
highlighted how landscape change, uncontrolled modernization, and climate
change have threatened the sustainability of local cultures across the
Nusantara. In her view, the current ecological crisis impacts not only the
environment but also erodes the identity, knowledge, and cultural practices of
communities that have long coexisted with nature.
This
perspective was reinforced by Dr. Herry Yogaswara, Head of BRIN's Research
Organization for Archaeology, Language, and Literature, who addressed the theme
"The Political Economy of Natural Resources and Local Culture." He
raised three fundamental questions: how laws, markets, and social legitimacy
work to create unequal access to resources; how such inequality transforms
local culture; and what cultural pathways could be pursued to address it.
According
to Herry, natural resource management that disregards local cultural
perspectives often results in both environmental destruction and the erosion of
cultural heritage. Development, he argued, needs to shift from a purely
growth-driven orientation toward a sustainability-driven approach, integrating
ecological risks and the interests of indigenous communities into public
policy.
Meanwhile,
Emilianus Ola Kleden, Executive Director of the Yayasan Masyarakat Kehutanan
Lestari (YMKL), emphasized the crucial role of civil society in advocacy and
the protection of indigenous territories. In his presentation, "The Role
of Civil Society in Advocacy and Protection of Indigenous Territories," he
stressed that civil society movements need to be supported by strong academic
research to gain legitimacy in influencing policy.
Emilianus
also critiqued the use of terms such as "culture of exploitation" or
"culture of corruption," which he said reflect a crisis of values and
a cultural crisis. He noted that language is not merely a tool of communication
but a mirror of a nation's civilizational condition. For this reason,
collaboration between academics and civil society organizations is essential to
strengthen efforts to protect indigenous communities and the environment.
From
a religious perspective, Dr. Budhy Munawar-Rachman, a lecturer at the
Driyarkara School of Philosophy, presented on "Ecotheology and the Values
of Environmental Preservation." He explained that ecotheology is a field
of study that connects religious teachings with environmental ethics to drive
concrete action in safeguarding the earth.
According
to Budhy, one root cause of today's environmental problems is the loss of
awareness that nature is sacred and deserving of respect. Nature is now more
often viewed purely as a resource to be exploited. He therefore called for a
shift away from anthropocentrism, which places humans at the center of all
things, toward biocentrism, which values all life as part of a single
ecosystem.
He
emphasized that environmental issues are no longer merely technical or
scientific matters, but moral and civilizational ones. Religious communities,
he said, have a strategic role to play in building ecological awareness through
education, culture, and religious practices oriented toward environmental
preservation.
Moderated
by Dr. Arifah Khusnuryani, M.Si., the seminar arrived at one central
conclusion: the environmental crisis cannot be resolved through technological
and economic policy approaches alone. What is needed is cultural
transformation, the strengthening of indigenous peoples' rights, and the
revitalization of spiritual values and ecological ethics, so that humanity can
once again build a harmonious relationship with nature as our shared home. (humassk)