The Faculty of Sharia and Law, UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta, has further strengthened its academic standing with the addition of a new doctorate in Islamic Political Law. Khoirul Anam earned his doctoral degree in Islamic Political Law after defending his dissertation titled “The Relationship between Political Islam and the Pancasila State in the Post-Reform Era, 1999–2019,” in the Open Doctoral Promotion Examination of the Doctoral Program in Islamic Law, held Wednesday (8/26/2026).
The examination took place in the Technoclass
Room of the Faculty of Sharia and Law, UIN Sunan Kalijaga. Khoirul Anam passed
with a perfect Cumulative Academic Achievement Index (IPKA) of 4.00, becoming
the 35th doctoral graduate of the Faculty of Sharia and Law, UIN Sunan Kalijaga.
The dissertation examines the shifting
relationship between Political Islam and the Pancasila State following the 1998
Reformasi. Anam observed that the
relatively accommodative relationship seen at the end of the New Order period
underwent change after Reformasi, as
democratic space opened up and contestation over ideas concerning the direction
of national and state life intensified.
According to Anam's research, this shift was not
solely a matter of ideological contest, but was also shaped by more complex
socio-political dynamics, including newly opened political opportunities,
dissatisfaction with the state, collective frustration stemming from a
multidimensional crisis, demoralization, experiences of injustice, belief in
the feasibility of implementing an Islamic political ideology, and changes in
national education policy.
Amid these conditions, Political Islam groups
constructed a framing narrative that the Pancasila State had not yet fully
realized its founding purposes. This narrative then became the basis for
mobilization in pursuing political and social agendas oriented toward
implementing Islamic values or systems.
This qualitative, descriptive-analytical study
employed an interdisciplinary approach drawing on social movement theory,
social interaction theory, and Maqāṣid
al-Sharī'ah (the objectives of Islamic law). Anam mapped the relationship
between Political Islam and the Pancasila State across a range of forms, from
cultural to structural movements, and from revolutionary to reformist-moderate
orientations.
At the cultural level, this relationship
manifested through the establishment of civil society organizations, the
ideologization of Islam and the idea of a caliphate, demonstrations, da'wah activities, symposiums, and the
Islamization of education. At the structural level, the struggle took shape
through the founding of Islamic political parties, efforts to revive the
Jakarta Charter, the legislation and implementation of sharia-influenced
regional regulations (perda), and the
use of identity politics.
Anam also found that this pattern of relations
shifted across three distinct periods. Between 1999 and 2004, the relationship
was marked by competition along structural-reformist lines and conflict along
cultural-revolutionary lines. The 2004–2014 period showed a pattern of
accommodation through structural-reformist channels alongside contravention
through revolutionary movements. Meanwhile, from 2014 to 2019, the relationship
again showed contravention through reformist-structural movements and conflict
through cultural-revolutionary movements.
Drawing on these findings, Anam proposes a
critical reciprocal model as the ideal framework for the relationship between
Political Islam and the Pancasila State. This model positions both entities on
equal footing, with a relationship built on mutual respect, tolerance, and
critical engagement, while remaining within legal bounds.
This concept stands as one of the dissertation's
key contributions. In this study's view, the relationship between Political Islam
and the Pancasila State need not be framed through a binary logic of
confrontation. Instead, it can be directed toward a reciprocal relationship
that allows for criticism, oversight, and mutual strengthening of national
life.
Principal advisor Prof. Dr. H. Riyanta, M.Hum.,
noted that Anam's academic journey reflected commitment and diligence in
defending his scholarly argument. He considered the work an important academic
contribution, particularly through its formulation of the reciprocal concept as
a model for the relationship between Political Islam and the Pancasila State.
According to Prof. Riyanta, this concept
demonstrates that the relationship between the two can be built reciprocally
and mutually reinforcing, while still maintaining a critical and constructive
mechanism of oversight.
Prof. Riyanta further noted that earning the
doctoral title carries new responsibilities for Anam. An academic degree, he
said, is not merely a personal achievement, but places the knowledge produced
through the dissertation within a broader responsibility, to continue
developing the study of Islamic political law and to contribute academically to
understanding the relationship between religion, the state, democracy, and
national life in Indonesia.
His achievement adds further academic strength to
the Faculty of Sharia and Law in advancing the study of sharia and law that is
not only academically rigorous, but also relevant to the dynamics of politics
and national life.
The academic process leading to Khoirul Anam's doctoral
degree culminated in an open examination involving a number of academics as
advisors and examiners. The session was chaired by Prof. Ali Sodiqin, with Dr.
Saifuddin as committee secretary. Prof. Riyanta, served as Principal Advisor I
and examiner, while Prof. Ahmad Zaini Anshori, served as Principal Advisor II
and examiner.
The remaining examiners were UIN Sunan Kalijaga
Professor Prof. Agus Moh. Najib, Dr. M. Rizal Qosim, and Dr. Hj. Siti Fatimah, along
with UGM Professor Prof. Diagal Wisesomarsomo, as external examiner. (humassk)